Providing & Addressing Feedback

This article defines procedures for submitting, addressing, and documenting feedback throughout development cycles using spreadsheets or Review 360.

Feedback Submission Methods

Approved Tools

• Review tools (e.g., Review 360)
• Spreadsheets (primary method for Grant Thornton reviewers)

Grant Thornton Process

• Reviewers compile comments into spreadsheets and email them to developers/PMs.
• Direct interaction with ReviewMe (RME) is not required

Roles & Responsibilities

Developer Requirements

• Address all feedback requests
• Implement QA/client edits
• Maintain documentation status

Reviewer Requirements

• Conduct re-reviews after initial QA edits
• Perform full QA review post-alpha edits

Review Process Stages

• Initial QA Edits → Mandatory re-review
• Client Reviews → Alpha/Beta edits implemented
• Final Edits → Re-review decision by Paula (client contact) based on change complexity

Documentation Standards

• In Review 360, check off (resolve) comments as completed 
• In client review spreadsheets, clearly mark items as "fixed" or "still outstanding"
• Update statuses in both spreadsheet and review tools
• Maintain version history for audit trails